ABSTRACT
RIGHT to the city is one of the most important citizenship RIGHTs that can be reduced for women under different circumstances. In this mixed research, with in-depth and semi-structured interviews, a conceptual model has been presented to explain the causal, contextual and interventional conditions effectively reducing women's RIGHT to the city. Then, with the structural equation modeling, the causal conditions affecting the RIGHT to the city have been investigated. Family, ethnicity, and physical and mental conditions were the most important background conditions that 32 women living in Ahvaz pointed to in order to influence the RIGHT to the city. Also, the participants considered politics and government institutions, law, and spatial policies as the most important intervention in the women's RIGHT to the city. City security, favorable actions with the city space, space-positive gender performance, and social welfare were among the most important causal conditions that the participants mentioned in increasing women's RIGHT to the city. Causal modeling showed that the most influential reason for reducing women's RIGHT to the city of Ahvaz is urban space security, followed by urban policies and designs. By multiplying the causal path, it is 0.84, followed by urban planning and design with a coefficient of 0.79. Governmental and executive institutions should pay more attention to women's RIGHT to the city through the establishment of better laws, the design of suitable spaces with individual differences, especially gender, and, of course, with an emphasis on women. The creation of safer places in the city for women while increasing the livability of the city for citizens improves women's RIGHTs in urban spaces
Extended abstract
Introduction
The RIGHT to the city is a universal RIGHT consisting of several instances. Since the RIGHT to the city enables the city inhabitants to access and enjoy the urban life benefits freely, it is tantamount to the RIGHT to freedom. The RIGHT to the city, the RIGHT to freedom of building and rebuilding cities, is one of the most valuable and, at the same time, the most neglected human RIGHTs. Among governments, NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations) and political activists in all scales, the RIGHT to the city is often conceived in a legal meaning. In this sense, the RIGHT to city includes a set of distinct RIGHTs to urban resources and services, shelter, public space, clean water, and education that must be available to all, regardless of social or economic status, the bearers of such RIGHTs are urban dwellers and their guarantor is the government. This legal conception of the RIGHT to the city emphasizes universal and individual RIGHTs in the global liberal institutional order. The ultimate normative purpose of a legal RIGHT to the city is that the government legally encodes and enforces the set of RIGHTs constituting the RIGHT to the city. Justice and equality have been considered since long ago; however, injustice and discrimination are still visible in cities. Among all kinds of injustices and discrimination, gender equality has been a subject marginalized in all ages. In Iran, the need for urban spaces for women in accordance with the civil needs of citizens in daily life is felt. In Iran, factors such as various types of urban violence and insecurity, which generally make women victims, have reduced the possibility and desire for their presence and participation in public. Because the spatial, temporal, official and unofficial divisions in the city have caused some spaces to remain far from the reach of women. In this research, we intend to deal with the most important factors that cause women not to enjoy one of their most essential human RIGHTs, which is the RIGHT to the city.
Methodology
This research, which is practical in terms of purpose, has been done with a confirmatory mixed method; first, it tried to present the most important contextual, interventional, and causal factors effective in reducing the RIGHT to the city of women in the form of a conceptual model by the approach of grounded theory, and then confirming the defined causal structure with the help of structural equations modeling. The population in this research is Iranian women who are exposed to gender injustice and do not have the RIGHT to a desirable city. Research participants have a deep experience of undermining their RIGHT to the city and are interested in sharing it and cooperating with the researcher. Sampling was purposefully selected from women with the least amount of the RIGHT to the city. The qualitative sample of the research was 32 people, and the quantitative sample was 420 people. Due to the mixed nature of the research and the use of the data-driven theory approach and, afterwards, structural equations to collect the data, the interview was used in the qualitative phase and questionnaires in the quantitative phase. The interviews were done in-depth, face-to-face and semi-structured. The open-ended interview questions were conducted in a calm environment without the presence of a third person, and the time of the interviews varied according to the conditions of the interviewee. The questionnaire used in the research has ascertained an instrument that evaluates the contextual and causal components and factors related to the RIGHT to the city in the form of self-declaration items. The data obtained from the interview, after being implemented in the form of text, were analyzed and classified with the help of directed content analysis. In order to investigate the causal structure of the RIGHT to the city, structural equation modeling would have been helpful. Analyzes were performed with the help of LISREL 8.8. To estimate the causal path coefficients, the iterated maximum likelihood method was used and the overall fit of the causal structure model of women’s RIGHT to the city was carried out by Chi-square statistic. And, of course, the most important fit indexes of the model, such as absolute fit indexes, incremental fit indexes and Parsimonious Normed Fit Indexes (PNFI).
Results and discussion
Directed content analysis helped us to identify the factors reducing the RIGHT to the city and its subclasses of Iranian women. Conditions affecting women's RIGHT to the city are divided into underlying conditions, causal conditions, and intervening conditions. The most critical underlying conditions were family, age, ethnicity, and physical and mental characteristics. At the same time, environment security, urban actions, social welfare, and space gender functions constituted the essential intervening conditions, and politics, governmental institutions, law, and city spatial policies included the most important intervening conditions. Causal modeling also showed that the factors influencing women's RIGHT to the city are the most influential to the least influential in the form of (1) security of the city environment, (2) urban policy-making, (3) gender function of space, and (4) interaction with the city. Security is one of the most important and influential factors that can decrease or increase the RIGHT to the city for women.
Conclusion
The RIGHT to the city, which is considered one of the most fundamental RIGHTs of citizens, is trampled or reaches its lowest level due to underlying reasons such as the gender of individuals or their families. In this case, women are more vulnerable than the men. In such a way, causal conditions such as environmental security or urban actions and, of course, welfare have made this gender difference in the use of city space deeper and more complicated. Meanwhile, the role of governments and sovereignty in legislation and policies should not be neglected to reduce the RIGHT to city for women. Our explicit suggestion is for governmental institutions and executive agencies to pay more attention to women’s RIGHT to the city through the establishment of better laws, the design of more suitable spaces in the city, the design of urban spaces away from any gender discrimination only with the view of equal access for all and the creation of safer places for the women living in Ahvaz.
Funding
There is no funding support.
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific.